<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Benchmarks on Nox | INT8 image and video inference</title><link>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/</link><description>Recent content in Benchmarks on Nox | INT8 image and video inference</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><atom:link href="https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Benchmark vs ComfyUI — RTX 3090</title><link>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmark3090/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmark3090/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="benchmark-vs-comfyui"&gt;Benchmark vs ComfyUI&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ComfyUI and Nox run the same generation jobs on the same machine, so the timings are directly comparable. Each pipeline is generated twice: a Cold run in a fresh process (including model and pipeline load) and a Warm run immediately afterwards. Speedup is calculated as &lt;code&gt;ComfyUI time / Nox time&lt;/code&gt;; above 1x means Nox was faster. Both engines load the exact same checkpoints: INT8 ConvRot for every pipeline except SDXL, which runs in FP16 on both.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Benchmark vs ComfyUI — RTX 4080</title><link>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmark4080/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmark4080/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="benchmark-vs-comfyui"&gt;Benchmark vs ComfyUI&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ComfyUI and Nox run the same generation jobs on the same machine, so the timings are directly comparable. Each pipeline is generated twice: a Cold run in a fresh process (including model and pipeline load) and a Warm run immediately afterwards. Speedup is calculated as &lt;code&gt;ComfyUI time / Nox time&lt;/code&gt;; above 1x means Nox was faster. Both engines load the exact same checkpoints: INT8 ConvRot for every pipeline except SDXL, which runs in FP16 on both.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Benchmark vs ComfyUI — RTX 5090</title><link>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmark5090/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmark5090/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="benchmark-vs-comfyui"&gt;Benchmark vs ComfyUI&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ComfyUI and Nox run the same generation jobs on the same machine, so the timings are directly comparable. Each pipeline is generated twice: a Cold run in a fresh process (including model and pipeline load) and a Warm run immediately afterwards. Speedup is calculated as &lt;code&gt;ComfyUI time / Nox time&lt;/code&gt;; above 1x means Nox was faster. Both engines load the exact same checkpoints: INT8 ConvRot for every pipeline except SDXL, which runs in FP16 on both.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Benchmark vs ComfyUI — H100</title><link>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmarkh100/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://noxengine.dev/benchmarks/benchmarkh100/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="benchmark-vs-comfyui"&gt;Benchmark vs ComfyUI&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ComfyUI and Nox run the same generation jobs on the same machine, so the timings are directly comparable. Each pipeline is generated twice: a Cold run in a fresh process (including model and pipeline load) and a Warm run immediately afterwards. Speedup is calculated as &lt;code&gt;ComfyUI time / Nox time&lt;/code&gt;; above 1x means Nox was faster. Both engines load the exact same checkpoints: INT8 ConvRot for every pipeline except SDXL, which runs in FP16 on both.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>